Folarin Balogun touched the ball just nineteen times before half-time.
It is an oddly forgettable statistic for a player whose availability had dominated almost every conversation leading up to the United States’ biggest match at the World Cup.
For thirty-six hours, football became something else entirely.
There were disciplinary hearings. Presidential phone calls. Legal arguments about frame rates. References to Article 27 of the FIFA Disciplinary Code that suddenly appeared across television broadcasts as though supporters regularly spent Sunday evenings reading judicial regulations. Then that guy from the US Apprentice TV show started making phone calls, and FIFA began making rather unusual noises.
The question after USA vs Belgium was never simply, “Did Balogun play against Belgium?”
It became something far stranger.
Should he have done so?
After all, he was born to Nigerian parents who were living in London. His parents were on holiday in the US – and by accident, not design, he was born in Brooklyn, New York, because the US airline wouldn’t allow his mother to fly. The family returned to the UK shortly after, and he grew up in London. Then, of course, there was the hilarity around the red card.
Red Card Balogun: The Suspension That Wasn’t
Balogun’s dismissal against Bosnia and Herzegovina looked straightforward enough.
A straight red.
One-match suspension.
Round of sixteen missed.
Football has lived quite happily with those consequences for decades.
Instead, FIFA discovered that Article 27 allowed the disciplinary committee to suspend the implementation of a punishment. The ban itself wasn’t removed. It was simply placed on probation for 12 months, along with a $40,000 fine for U.S. Soccer.
An unusual solution.
Not unprecedented, admittedly. Cristiano Ronaldo once benefited from the same legal mechanism.
But football has an excellent memory for timing.
Nobody remembers obscure disciplinary clauses until they suddenly become useful.
Mauricio Pochettino celebrated what he described as justice restored.
Donald Trump once again became front and centre of an international incident by inciting that this was America’s best player and a red card was unfair. Not sure if it works like that. Also, why should a politician (a very bad one at that) become embroiled in a sporting decision?
Independence Day USA Meets Institutional Theatre
There was something wonderfully peculiar about the timing.
The United States entered the match as the final CONCACAF nation standing after Canada and Mexico had exited their own World Cup.
Only days removed from Independence Day USA, the symbolism practically wrote itself.
Belgium carried something slightly different. The wants and desires of everyone who hated the political intervention of the red card.
Footballers often insist that outside noise never matters.
Tim Ream said exactly that. Perhaps he believed it.
Belgium certainly played as though they had heard every word.
Charles De Ketelaere Ignored The Script
Nine minutes.
That was all Charles De Ketelaere required.
The opener arrived with almost insulting simplicity.
By the thirty-third minute, he had another.
Alex Freeman found himself physically overpowered. Tim Ream found himself underneath another towering Belgian leap.
Sometimes tactical plans collapse.
Sometimes, one footballer simply decides he is better than everyone attempting to stop him.
De Ketelaere finished with two goals and an assist.
Player of the Match.
Quite difficult to appeal against.
Sterile Possession Is Still Sterile
Pochettino’s United States actually enjoyed more possession.
Fifty-six per cent possession.
Four hundred and fifty-eight completed passes.
Eighty-seven per cent accuracy.
It looked impressive in exactly the same way beautifully wrapped empty boxes look impressive beneath a Christmas tree.
The Americans passed.
Belgium scored.
Football remains gloriously uninterested in aesthetic spreadsheets.
Although Trump will probably try to rewrite the FIFA World Cup rules so the USMNT win by the aesthetic spreadsheet metric.
Failing that, he can always print off his own certificate for the team.
Balogun Finally Played Against Belgium
So, did Balogun play against Belgium?
Yes.
But he shouldn’t have done.
That was, after all, the entire point of the previous two days.
Balogun, born in New York, grew up in England and represented England throughout the youth ranks, but ultimately chose the United States at the senior level. His international allegiance was never really the issue.
His availability for this specific evening was.
After extraordinary political pressure and legal argument, the striker finally took his place.
Nineteen first-half touches.
No shot on target.
Substituted in the ninety-second minute.
Millions of words had been written to ensure his participation.
Football replied with complete indifference.
There is something almost artistic about that.
The Moment Everything Became Ridiculous
Matt Freese actually began brilliantly.
Forty-six seconds had barely elapsed before producing an outstanding diving save.
Yet, nobody remembers the save if they remember what happened later.
Freese sprinted into no man’s land in the 57th minute.
Paused.
Changed his mind.
Lost possession.
Hans Vanaken looked up.
Thirty-five yards.
Empty goal.
Three-one.
Goalkeepers rarely destroy themselves through lack of ability.
Usually, it is hesitation.
Football punishes uncertainty with remarkable efficiency.
And poetically, it punished a nation trying to cheat everyone else.
Lukaku World Cup Memories Never Really Fade
Christian Pulisic’s evening ended injured.
Belgium sensed weakness.
Romelu Lukaku entered from the bench.
Some footballers smell opportunity.
Lukaku appears to detect it from several postcodes away.
Chris Richards attempted a clearance deep into stoppage time.
Instead, he delivered possession directly into Belgian territory.
Lukaku rolled his defender, finished calmly, then celebrated with what immediately became known online as the Lukaku Trump dance, a moment that spread across social media almost as quickly as Belgium’s final act of trolling.
Four-one.
No controversy.
Just football.
“Overturn This.”
The final act belonged to Belgium.
As players disappeared towards the tunnel, reports emerged of Belgian voices shouting:
“Overturn this.”
The official national team account embraced it too, posting Lukaku’s celebration alongside the exact same caption, striking through “soccer” in favour of “FOOTBALL.”
Football has always adored tiny acts of revenge.
It remembers them far longer than anyone admits.
The wider lesson lingered long after the memes faded.
Institutions can reinterpret regulations.
Politicians can make phone calls.
On this occasion, it wasn’t a legal argument that settled USA vs Belgium.
It was Charles De Ketelaere, Romelu Lukaku, and a Belgian side that decided the only appeal worth hearing would be delivered on the scoreboard.
doragon sports 
One response to “USA vs Belgium: Technically a US Citizen, Technically Allowed to Play, Donked Out by Belgium”
[…] outstanding 4-1 demolition of hosts USA may have been their finest performance of the tournament, but it came at a high […]
LikeLike